Does carbon dating work dinosaurs datingd ru
But the differences arise because of the of the two groups. They also have a different, but significant vested interest: their fear of a personal God who will judge them into eternity. As a side-note, it’s often remarked that carbon-14 dating is “corrected” using tree-ring dating, which makes it accurate out to many tens of thousands of years.
Christians believe the history of the earth to be as stated in Genesis which is God’s direct revelation to us. The museum curator from whose museum the dinosaur bone samples were taken was outraged. Scientists who believe the creation account of Genesis, Chapter 1 are still scientists even if their conclusions differ from the “majority” opinion. Antichristian scientists are not neutral, as they’d have you believe. To understand what it means to “correct” the carbon-14 age using tree-ring methods, take a look at , a site by practicing medical doctor Sean Pitman.
Scientists who are Christians who adhere to a six-day creation would recognize that it’s expected that there would be some carbon-14 in the bones because not enough time has passed for all of it to decay (since the age of the earth is less than 2 half-lives of carbon-14).
But since the age predicted by the method is wrong (i.e.
Evolutionists “know” the dates are wrong because they believe the earth is much, much older than what God tells us it is. “Carbon dating dinosaur bones is ludicrous, and the fact they yielded numbers is meaningless.” Another remark noted in the article was “. An objective scientist would explore the discrepancies produced by the dating methods. If dinosaur bones are not 65 million years old, then this poses serious problems to the entire modern science guild who has built its house upon the sandy shores of evolution theory. Another common “explanation” — other than contamination — though it’s really just a theory, is that the carbon-14 that exists in the bones was produced by millions of years of uranium and thorium decaying underground and injecting the bones with carbon-14 isotopes produced during the decay process.
* Carbon-14 is Everywhere so it Can't Be an Anomaly: Carbon-14 doesn't lie. And it's so unstable that all 14c atoms in a sample would radioactively decay in far less than a million years.
Of course we're hoping that now that we've corrected the material below, that this is solid A work!
As reported elsewhere also in limestone, fossilized wood, coal, marble, deep groundwater, geological graphite, Mesozoic-layer limestone, and the bones of dinosaurs including the ten described below.
They can measure the ratios of the elements in creatures that have died “Having established the world-wide uniformity of the radiocarbon assay at the present time, it seems a logical assumption that this would have been true in ancient times.” [Science Magazine, Vol. (In fact, we know the ratios are changing now, and have been over time.) A THEORY’S PREDICTION IS INCORRECT, BUT IT CAN’T BE THE THEORY THAT’S WRONG…
Since modern scientists “know” dinosaurs died millions of years ago, In this particular case, the dinosaurs were dated to between 10,000 and 25,000 years old.
greater than 6000 years), then that would mean that the assumptions used are invalid — further research and data is needed to refine the method.
It’s important to recognize this main idea: both Christians and evolutionists disagree with the results of the tests on dinosaur bones. They have vested interests in one or both of those things.
This The theory predicts that the test results should say that the bones are at least 50,000 years old.