Backdating issue Chatrulet style sex chat
Documenting a transaction which has already happened One possible scenario is that the relevant transaction has already happened, but just hasn’t been documented yet.For example, there may have been a transfer of trade from one group company to another on a particular date.As from that date, customers may have been invoiced by the transferee, employees may have been paid by the transferee, and accounting entries may have been made to reflect the purchase price payable for the assets.Together, these factors may indicate that the beneficial interest in the relevant assets has passed from a legal point of view.
Although it may have been intended to put in place a new arrangement by a particular date – often a year end – that date may now have passed. Obviously the ideal position is to put in place the legal documents in advance. Well, it depends on what was transferred, and whether it can be said that the relevant transaction has already happened.
One was sent to the subscriber, and the other was stored in their records, and then logged to CT when they logged all their certs.
Wo Sign has since updated their system to use better locking. The audit report says: We understand that remediation action was taken by Wo Sign to revoke those certificates in a timely manner.
This seems like a surprisingly long delay for a relatively simple change, given how quickly Wo Sign have been able to update their systems in other cases.
However, as noted above, this is not a BR violation. These certificates are identical in all ways (including their serial numbers) except for their not Before dates, which are 37 seconds apart.
These may include registering the transfer of land or intellectual property rights, or obtaining third party consents or releases.